Which of the following best describes 'systems' in performance training?

In the context of performance training, 'systems' refer to a coordinated body of methods that work together to achieve specific performance outcomes. This approach emphasizes the importance of integrating various training techniques, protocols, and modalities to create a comprehensive and cohesive training program. A well-defined system enhances effectiveness, consistency, and adaptability in training, ensuring that various elements reinforce each other rather than work independently or at cross purposes.

The notion of a coordinated body implies that each method or component within the system has a specific role and purpose, contributing to a larger strategy aimed at enhancing athletic performance. This alignment between methods allows for more efficient training cycles, better recovery, and ultimately improved results.

In contrast, the other options do not capture the essence of what a 'system' entails. A disorganized collection of methods lacks the necessary structure and coherence to foster effective training outcomes. An individual technique does not represent the holistic approach that 'systems' embody, as it isolates one aspect rather than integrating multiple elements. Similarly, a random selection of strategies suggests a lack of planning and organization, which would not yield the systematic approach needed for optimal performance training.